Your team already pays for Microsoft Dynamics 365, and someone has suggested using it for stakeholder engagement too. Theoretically, it makes sense. Dynamics CRM can store contacts, log meetings, and generate reports. In practice, most stakeholder engagement teams we talk to end up with patchy data, frustrated users, and 30 paid licenses nobody uses.
We talk to government, infrastructure, mining, and energy teams every week who are struggling with this exact decision. The pattern is consistent: Dynamics is adopted at the enterprise level for sales and customer service, then someone on the stakeholder engagement team is told to use it, too. A year later, the data is incomplete, the team is back on spreadsheets, and the licenses are sitting idle.
This guide walks through what Microsoft Dynamics is built for, what a stakeholder CRM (also called SRM, or Stakeholder Relationship Management software) does differently, and how to figure out which one fits your team.
Table of contents
-
The core difference: sales relationships vs stakeholder relationships
-
The hidden costs of forcing Dynamics to do stakeholder management work
Dynamics CRM vs a stakeholder CRM: a side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Microsoft Dynamics CRM | Stakeholder CRM (e.g. Jambo SRM software) |
| Primary purpose | Sales pipeline, customer service, marketing automation | Stakeholder engagement, consultation, Indigenous relations |
| Data model | Leads, opportunities, accounts, deals | Stakeholders, communications, issues, commitments, communities |
| Core unit of work | Closing a deal | Logging an engagement and tracking a commitment |
| Out-of-the-box reports | Sales forecasts, pipeline reports, conversion metrics | Engagement history, issues by stakeholder, commitment status, sentiment trends |
| Best for | Enterprise sales and marketing teams | Stakeholder, community, and Indigenous engagement teams |
Read our comparison of Jambo vs Simply Stakeholders→
What is Microsoft Dynamics CRM?
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is a customer relationship management platform built for sales, marketing, and customer service teams. It tracks leads, opportunities, deals, accounts, and customer cases through a pipeline. If you've heard it called Dynamics CRM, MS Dynamics, or Microsoft CRM, it's the same product.
It's powerful, customizable, and integrates well with the rest of the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, including Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and Power BI. For sales organizations, it's a strong fit.
The core data model follows the same logic as Salesforce or HubSpot: contacts move through a pipeline toward a sale, and the software helps you forecast revenue, automate follow-ups, and report on conversion rates.
What is a stakeholder CRM (SRM)?
A stakeholder CRM, more accurately called Stakeholder Relationship Management (SRM) software, is built specifically for teams managing stakeholder engagement, consultation, and community relations. Think of Indigenous communities, regulators, elected officials, municipal staff, landowners, advocacy groups, and members of the public.
Where a CRM tracks conversions and deals, an SRM tracks a relationship that doesn't close. There's no signed contract at the end. Instead, you're managing commitments, issues, sentiment, consultation records, and audit trails over the life of a project, sometimes for decades.
SRM platforms like Jambo are designed around how stakeholder management or engagement teams actually work: logging every interaction, tracking promises made to communities, mapping engagement geographically, and generating reports for regulators or executives in seconds.
The core difference: sales relationships vs stakeholder relationships
This is where most teams get stuck. Theoretically, Dynamics 365 and a stakeholder CRM look similar. Both store contacts. Both log interactions. Both generate reports. But the underlying logic is completely different.
A sales CRM assumes a linear pipeline: lead, qualified lead, opportunity, deal, closed. Success is a transaction.
Stakeholder engagement isn't linear. You might engage with the same First Nation, advocacy group, or municipal council for 15 years across multiple projects. Success isn't a sale. It's trust, a social license to operate, regulatory approval, and a documented record of consultation.
That difference shows up in everything: how data is structured, which fields are included by default, which reports are pre-built, and how the interface is designed for the people using it every day.
One of our customers in the UK educational research told us their team uses Dynamics, but "because Dynamics is not geared for stakeholder management, it's difficult to get internal users to actually use it." When the tool doesn't fit the workflow, people stop entering data. When data stops flowing in, reports stop being useful.
Where Dynamics CRM falls short for stakeholder management
Dynamics is a strong product. But strong for sales is not the same as right for stakeholder work.
Here's where the gaps show up for stakeholder teams:
-
The data model works against you: Dynamics is built around accounts, contacts, and opportunities. When your contact is a First Nation, a community group, or a specific geographic area, you end up reshaping the data model to fit, usually by creating custom entities and fields that require IT support to build and maintain.
-
No native sentiment tracking: Capturing whether a community is supportive, neutral, or opposed to a project is fundamental to stakeholder work. In Dynamics, you'd build that yourself. In a purpose-built SRM, every communication is recorded, with AI-powered analysis that automatically surfaces sentiment.
-
Issues and commitments have no dedicated structure: Demonstrating the commitment made to a community in 2019, who made it, what was promised, and whether it's been delivered, is exactly the kind of question regulators and auditors ask. Dynamics has no native structure for this. You build custom fields, train people in the process, and then hope they do it, and it holds up under scrutiny.
-
Reporting takes too long: When the tool doesn't fit the workflow, people stop entering data. When data stops flowing in, reports stop being useful. Teams we speak to regularly describe spending weeks per quarter compiling engagement reports, whereas a purpose-built SRM generates them in seconds.
When Microsoft Dynamics 365 is the right choice
To be fair, Dynamics is the right answer for plenty of teams. Stick with it if:
-
Stakeholder engagement is a supporting activity, not a core function, and your data needs are relatively light: contact records, meeting logs, and basic reporting.
-
You already have a large Dynamics 365 deployment and a dedicated IT team to maintain and customize it.
-
You're already paying for licences, and the business case for an additional tool is hard to make.
-
Your stakeholder team is small, and the engagement volume is low enough that custom-built fields and workarounds are manageable.
-
If most of those apply, Dynamics with thoughtful customization can work. It won't be elegant, but it'll function.
Learn more about CRM for stakeholder management→
When you need a stakeholder CRM
Switch to, or add, a purpose-built stakeholder CRM if:
-
Stakeholder engagement, consultation, or Indigenous relations is a core function of your work.
-
You're accountable to regulators, communities, or the public, and you need a defensible audit trail.
-
You manage commitments and issues that span years across multiple projects.
-
You need sentiment tracking, geospatial mapping, or GDPR-compliant opt-in management for consultation records.
-
Your team is spending significant time building reports from scratch each quarter.
-
Adoption of your current system is inconsistent, and people are reverting to spreadsheets.
-
You've tried customizing Dynamics for stakeholder work, and the build keeps getting deprioritized by IT.
That last point is the one we hear most often. A senior stakeholder engagement manager at a UK healthcare agency told us her team had "sat in the queue" for Dynamics customization for over a year. They needed the work done now.
The hidden costs of forcing Dynamics to do stakeholder work
The hidden costs are where Dynamics deployments get expensive for stakeholder teams.
Some hidden costs you might not be aware of:
-
Customization and integrator fees to build stakeholder-specific entities and workflows are commonly quoted between $50,000 and $150,000, with annual maintenance contracts to keep those customizations up to date as Microsoft releases updates.
-
Training time for non-sales users who don't think in pipeline logic adds up.
-
Lost productivity when the team reverts to Excel because the workflow in Dynamics is too cumbersome to log a quick meeting.
-
The resource time spent on creating reports can sometimes add up to weeks per quarter.
-
The risk exposure when commitments and issues aren't consistently tracked, leading to a gap during a regulatory review.
Can you use both? How Dynamics and stakeholder CRM work together
You don't have to pick one. Many of our customers run Dynamics for their sales, marketing, and customer service teams and Jambo for their stakeholder, Indigenous relations, or community engagement teams.
The result: sales keep the tool they need; stakeholder engagement teams get the tool they need, and data flows between them where it makes sense.
How to choose between Dynamics CRM and Stakeholder CRM
Run through these five questions before deciding.
-
Who's the primary user? If it's sales, Dynamics. If it's engagement, consultation, or Indigenous relations, a stakeholder CRM is needed.
-
What's the core unit of work? Closing deals points to Dynamics. Logging engagements, tracking commitments, and managing issues over the years point to the need for a stakeholder CRM.
-
Do you need an audit trail that meets regulatory requirements? If so, you want a tool that has this built in, not one that requires configuration afterward.
-
What's your IT capacity? Smaller teams without dedicated IT get more value from a purpose-built tool. Enterprise teams with strong IT can make Dynamics work, but should weigh whether it's the best use of that capacity.
-
What's the total cost over three years? Add licenses, customization, integration, training, and the cost of reports your team can't generate quickly. Compare that to a purpose-built SRM that includes those capabilities.
If you answer those honestly and Dynamics still wins, stick with it. If you're hesitating on more than two, a stakeholder CRM is worth a closer look.
Find out the reasons you shouldn't use a CRM for stakeholder engagement→
How Jambo helps stakeholder engagement teams using Dynamics
Jambo is built specifically for stakeholder engagement, consultation, and Indigenous relations. Dynamics wasn't designed for any of these.
With Jambo SRM software:
-
You create a stakeholder profile for every contact, organization and location with full engagement history.
-
Every interaction can be logged in seconds from Outlook, in a few minutes directly in the platform.
-
Issues and commitments live in dedicated modules with built-in timelines and task management.
-
Sentiment is tracked for every communication record. Jambo AI Sentiment can automatically analyze communication records and auto-set sentiment.
-
Integrated geospatial tools can be easily used to map your stakeholders and visualize engagement, with a native Esri ArcGIS Pro integration.
-
Reporting takes seconds, not weeks.
-
Jambo is ISO 27001:2022 and ISO 27017:2015 certified and stores all data in secure AWS infrastructure with no AI training on customer data. For government teams and organizations working on regulated projects, that's not a footnote. It's often the deciding factor.
-
Our Customer Success team can help you with data migration from Dynamics and get your team up and running in weeks.
If you're sitting on unused Dynamics licenses and your stakeholder team is back on spreadsheets, that's a sign worth listening to. Book a 15-minute call, and we'll tell you honestly whether Jambo fits, where it doesn't, and what migration would look like.
Frequently Asked Questions about stakeholder CRM
Is Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM the same as Dynamics CRM?
Yes. Microsoft Dynamics 365 CRM is the current product name for what used to be called Microsoft Dynamics CRM. The capabilities have evolved significantly, but the core platform and primary use case (sales, marketing, customer service) remain the same.
Can Dynamics CRM be used for stakeholder management?
Technically, yes, with customization. In practice, most teams find that the data model, default workflows, and reporting are built for sales, not for stakeholder engagement. The result is low adoption, high configuration costs, and a tool that doesn't reflect how engagement teams actually work.
Is a stakeholder CRM more expensive than Dynamics 365?
For stakeholder-specific use cases, a purpose-built SRM is almost always cheaper than a customized Dynamics deployment once you factor in integrator fees, ongoing maintenance, and the internal time spent building reports and workarounds. If you're already running Dynamics for sales, adding a stakeholder CRM is a separate cost, but typically a much smaller one than the alternative.
Can a stakeholder CRM integrate with Dynamics?
Yes. Jambo integrates with Outlook, connects through Zapier to over 7,000 other tools, and offers a public API for direct integrations with Dynamics 365 or other enterprise systems.
How long does it take to switch from Dynamics to a stakeholder CRM?
For most teams, a few weeks. Migration involves exporting contacts and engagement records from Dynamics, mapping them to the new system, and running both systems in parallel for a brief period. Our Customer Success team manages most of the migration process for you.
